USPTO serial 97078981
TURBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURAND, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TURBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Feeney
Alan Feeney FEENEY IP LAW235 PROMENADE STREETSUITE 141PROVIDENCE, RI 02908Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms, both that manages customer and business contacts databases; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms, both that provides worksite management services such as identifying the timing of work to be completed, scheduling employees needed to complete certain work and identifying the location of materials and equipment at a particular site and/or identifying the need for certain materials and equipment for a worksite and scheduling the delivery of materials and equipment to a worksite as needed to complete designated tasks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms, both that manages contractor agreements, including tracking associated costs and expenses, maintaining employee timesheets and determining amount of building materials and employees available, dispatching sales representatives to prospective customers and providing such representatives with construction project price quotations, coordinating the assignment of technicians, as needed, to a particular construction site and preparing customer invoices; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms, both that converts paper-based records into cloud-based electronic records and storing converted records online; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software and platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms, both featuring payment processing software | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2022 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2022 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |