USPTO serial 97079764
MINT PASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NIEMANN, SHELBY LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINT PASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALENA HERRANEN
ALENA HERRANEN HERRANEN LAW4365 SAMOSET AVENUESAN DIEGO, CA 92117United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Authentication of data in the field of travel and entertainment, in the nature of digital art, souvenirs, collectibles and keepsakes authenticated by non-fungible tokens using blockchain technology; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for creating, storing, displaying, tracking, sharing, exchanging, buying and selling non-fungible tokens, crypto-collectibles, and digital art, souvenirs, collectibles, and keepsakes authenticated by non fungible tokens, all of the foregoing in the field of travel and entertainment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, storing, displaying, tracking, sharing, exchanging, buying and selling non-fungible tokens, crypto-collectibles, and digital art, souvenirs, collectibles, and keepsakes authenticated by non fungible tokens, all of the foregoing in the field of travel and entertainment; Computer programming services, namely, content creation for virtual worlds and three dimensional platforms; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for accessing, reading, and tracking information in the field of travel and entertainment, in the nature of digital art, souvenirs, collectibles and keepsakes authenticated by non-fungible tokens on a blockchain | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2024 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |