USPTO serial 97085697
ENERGYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENERGYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon Gibbons
Jon Gibbons FLEIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW4800 N FEDERAL HIGHWAY, SUITE B - 306BOCA RATON, FL 33431UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use) Lithium extraction technologies, namely, membranes using nanotechnology, ion exchange technologies and process, absorption technologies and process, solvent extraction technologies and process and electrodialysis technologies and process for lithium extraction and separation; lithium chloride solution | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | (Based on Intent to Use) Lithium metal litium coating and plating for batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Electric storage technologies; solid state batteries; lithium-ion batteries; and lithium extraction devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (Based on Intent to Use) Mining of salt water brine, and other lithium containing material with direct lithium extraction technologies; Mining of salt water brine, and other rare earth element or battery element containing material for mineral extraction purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Treatment, separation, and refinery of salt water brine, and other lithium-containing material with direct lithium extraction technologies; Treatment, refinery, and mining of salt water brine and other rare earth elements or battery elements containing material for mineral extraction purposes | ACTIVE | Jun 12, 2019 |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Research and development of in the field of lithium extraction and salt removal technologies; Research and development of energy storage, renewable energy generation, recycling, and energy technology related materials | ACTIVE | Jun 12, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENERGYX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 31, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |