Drawing for MANSION

USPTO serial 97090319

MANSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia A. Olosky, Registration No. 53,411

Patricia A. Olosky, Registration No. 53,411 THE WEBB LAW FIRMONE GATEWAY CENTER420 FORT DUQUESNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Amusement arcade services; gaming services in the nature of casino gaming, namely, blackjack, keno, craps, roulette, poker, slot machines, pontoon, boule, baccarat, punto banco, chemin defer, mini-dice, fan tan, sic bo, pal gow, pal gow poker, lucky wheel, casino war, red dog; providing facilities for the use of video poker machines; providing recreational facilities, namely, swimming pools, gymnasium, health clubs, exercise clubs and exercise facilities; planning sports competitions; booking of seats for shows; providing sports facilities; planning, arranging and conducting of sports competitions; off track betting services; bingo hall services; providing on-line electronic non-downloadable publications in the nature of books and journals in the field of sports events results, news events, offers of bets, and betting odds; publication of on-line publications, namely, electronic books and journals; providing non-downloadable on-line games; and provision of online computer games by means of a computer based systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance