USPTO serial 97090679
LIGHTEN UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTEN UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Geller
Michael A. Geller DLA Piper LLP (US)444 West Lake Street, Suite 900Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Psychological intervention therapy services in the fields of smoking cessation, addiction, obesity, weight loss, weight management, and behavioural modification; telemedicine services, medical services, virtual health care services, health counseling, and medical assistance, all for support of a medically assisted weight loss program; providing medical information about smoking cessation, addiction, weight loss, weight management, and behavioural modification via a website and a mobile application; providing pharmaceutical advice; health care services, namely, providing medical and psychological assessment services; psychotherapy services; group nutritional therapy services; weight loss coaching and counselling in the nature of providing weight loss program services; weight loss counselling in the nature of providing smoking cessation treatment services; addiction treatment and counselling services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services accessible by means of downloadable mobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |