USPTO serial 97093208
UNITED WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLIFFORD, MEGAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNITED WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Schloff
Jay Schloff AIDENBAUM SCHLOFF AND BLOOM PLLC6960 ORCHARD LAKE ROADSUITE 250WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Antennas; Cellular phones; Mobile phones; Stands adapted for mobile phones; Tablet computers; Audio speakers; Battery chargers for mobile phones; Carrying cases, holders, protective cases and stands featuring power supply connectors, adaptors, speakers and battery charging devices, specially adapted for use with handheld digital electronic devices, namely, mobile phones; Cases for mobile phones; Hands free devices for mobile-phones; Mobile telephone accessories, namely, belt clips; Protective cases for smartphones; Protective cases for tablet computers; Wireless speakers | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2003 |
| 038 | Communications by means of mobile phones | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |