USPTO serial 97096097
TRUESIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRENDAN K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUESIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA C. MILLER
LAURA C. MILLER KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1001 WEST FOURTH STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101-2400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing, advertising, and promotional services using augmented reality computer software for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of viewing, capturing, recording and editing augmented images and augmented videos; providing online advertising services for others; dissemination of advertising for others via computer and other communication networks; online retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; providing an internet website portal featuring links to the online retail web sites of others; facilitating the exchange and sale of services and products of third parties via computer and communication networks, namely, operating on-line marketplaces for sellers and buyers of goods and services; consumer profiling for commercial or marketing purposes; Providing consumer information and advice for consumers in the selection of products to buy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |