Drawing for NEURON PLATFORM

USPTO serial 97097440

NEURON PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEURON PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Cannuscio

Robert E. Cannuscio FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE, STE. 2000PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6996UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software which integrates a user's existing data with external data sources for providing data analysis, business intelligence and customer information; Downloadable software for data collection and analysis for matching customer and business data with third party dataACTIVE—
035Data collection and analysis for matching customer and business data with third party data for business purposesACTIVE—
042Providing online platform services featuring non-downloadable software which allows users to obtain tailored data analysis business intelligence and customer information; Platform as a service featuring non-downloadable software providing data analysis business intelligence and customer information; Providing a web-based service featuring technology for use in data analysis; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to conduct data mining and analytics; Providing a web-based service featuring technology for use in uploading and enhancing customer data; Providing a web-based service featuring technology that enables users to onboard electronic customer and business data for enhancing the data by matching it with third party dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance