USPTO serial 97097483
AEROCENTRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEROCENTRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent Capehart
Brent Capehart PALMER IP INC.704-1478 WEST HASTINGS STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6G3J6CanadaGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software applications using a collaborative user platform to analyze aircraft parking positions and aircraft movements during approaches and departures at an airport; downloadable software applications that analyze aircraft types and attributes to manage parking positions and aircraft movements during approaches and departures at an airport; downloadable software applications that collect, monitor, and provide information to users on aircraft type, model, parking positions and aircraft movements during approaches and departures at an airport, including aircraft push back procedures and procedures specific to aircraft type and model; downloadable software applications that detect aircraft collisions, near misses and accidents between aircraft, ground vehicles and other equipment; downloadable software applications that provide analysis of aircraft collisions, near misses and accidents between aircraft, ground vehicles and other equipment; downloadable software applications that provide information on aircraft type, model, locations and movements in each area of an airport; downloadable manuals in the field of airport management; downloadable manuals in the field of aircraft management in an airport; downloadable software for managing the movements of aircraft in airports; downloadable guides, brochures, and booklets in the field of airport management; downloadable guides, brochures, and booklets in the field of software for managing the movements of aircraft in airports | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Training materials, namely, printed manuals, workbooks, study guides, brochures, in the field of airport management, instruction pamphlets in the field of airport management; printed manuals in the field of airport management; printed manuals in the field of aircraft management in an airport; printed guides, brochures and booklets in the field of airport management; printed guides brochures, and booklets in the field of software for managing movement of aircraft in an airport | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing webinar, online, and classroom training in the field of airport management and operations and distribution of course material in connection therewith; web-based and live training in the field of airport management and operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that uses a collaborative user platform to analyze aircraft parking positions and aircraft movements during approaches and departures at an airport; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that analyzes aircraft types and attributes to manage parking positions and aircraft movements during approaches and departures at an airport, including aircraft push back procedures and procedures specific to aircraft type and model; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that collect, monitor, and provide automated video analysis of aircraft parking positions and aircraft movements during approaches and departures at an airport; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that detect aircraft collisions, near misses and accidents between aircraft, ground vehicles and other equipment; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that provide analysis of aircraft collisions, near misses and accidents between aircraft, ground vehicles and other equipment; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that provide information on the road users in each area; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software that provide information on aircraft type, model, locations and movements in each area of an airport; providing online non-downloadable manuals in the field of airport management; providing online non-downloadable manuals in the field of aircraft management in an airport; providing online non-downloadable software for managing movement of aircraft in an airport; providing online non-downloadable guides, brochures, and booklets in the field of airport management; providing online non-downloadable guides, brochures, and booklets in the field of software for managing the movements of aircraft in airports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 26, 2026 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 6, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |