USPTO serial 97100077
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jun-Hwa Jeong
Jun-Hwa Jeong RABIN & BERDO, P.C.2650 PARK TOWER DRIVE, SUITE 800VIENNA, VA 22180UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development; Development, updating and maintenance of software; Data conversion of computer program data or information, other than physical conversion; Data mining; Updating of home pages for computer networks; Creating of home pages for computer networks; Development, design and updating of home pages; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Database development services; Electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; Development and creation of computer programmes for data processing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |