USPTO serial 97109673
REPLENISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERLIN, JUSTIN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REPLENISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Perkowski
THOMAS J. PERKOWSKI THOMAS J. PERKOWSKI, ESQ., PC6 THORNDAL CIRCLEDARIEN, CT 06820UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Ophthalmic Solution Preparation For Promoting Eye Health And Human Vision For Optimum Eye Function; Eye Artificial Tear Solution For The Provision Of Ocular Surface Lubrication; Vitamins, Antioxidants And Fatty Acids To Optimize Tear Film Supplementation, Osmolarity And Stability; Ophthalmic Sterile Solution For Osmoprotection, Thermoregulation And Anti-Inflammation Of Tear Film, Ocular Surface, Eyelids And Eyelashes; Ophthalmic Eye Solution For Eyelid Exfoliation, Optimization of Meibomian Gland Function And Promoting Eyelid Function; Preservative-Free Artificial Tear Sterile Ophthalmic Solution Preparation For Preserving The Ocular Surface | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |