USPTO serial 97116394
NHANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NHANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Staple
David W. Staple CASIMIR JONES, S.C.2275 DEMING WAY, STE. 310MIDDLETON, WI 53562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Electrically conducting inks; printing inks with electric conductivity; electrically conductive screen-printing inks; electrically conductive inks for printing; inks containing nanomaterials; dispersions containing nanomaterials; inks containing carbon nanomaterials; dispersions containing carbon nanomaterials; printing inks containing carbon nanomaterials; electrically conducting inks containing carbon nanomaterials; electrically conductive coatings; coatings containing carbon nanomaterials; all of the aforesaid containing functionalised nanomaterials for high-tech products in relation to electronics or printing | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Printing of electrically conducting inks; printing of inks containing nanomaterials; printing of inks containing carbon nanomaterials; application of coatings and films using spraying techniques; application of nanomaterial-containing coatings and films using spraying techniques; application of carbon nanomaterial-containing coatings and films using spraying techniques; application of conductive coatings and films using spraying techniques; all of the aforesaid containing functionalised nanomaterials for high-tech products in relation to electronics or printing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |