Drawing for PAWFECT

USPTO serial 97118962

PAWFECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLINT, DANIEL LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 306- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PAWFECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GU, WEI

GU, WEI TIANYU LAW GROUP, INC.9660 FLAIR DR, STE 328EL MONTE, CA 91731UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Artificial eyelash tweezers; Battery-powered animal nail grinders; Blades and brushes for electric hair clippers and trimmers; Blades for electric razors; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Depilatory appliances; Dog clippers; Electric and battery-powered hair clippers; Electric and battery-powered hair trimmers; Electric animal nail grinders; Electric manicure sets; Electric nail buffers; Electric nail clippers; Electric nail files; Electric pedicure sets; Emery boards; Epilatory appliances; Fishing knives; Fishing line cutters; Fishing tackle pliers; Foot care implements, namely, foot files; Foot care implements, namely, foot scrapers; Hair-removing tweezers; Hair clippers; Hair clippers for children, animals, dogs; Hair cutting scissors; Hair trimmers; Hand-operated cleaning tool in the nature of a pick for removing intestines from lobsters; Hand-operated dog waste collection apparatus comprising a rod with a clamp at its end for holding a disposable bag that may be positioned beneath a dog to collect feces; Hand tools for repair and maintenance of bicycles; Hand tools, namely, clamps; Manicure sets; Manicure sets, electric; Manual clippers; Nail buffers; Nail buffers for use in manicure; Nail buffers, electric or non-electric; Nail clippers; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files; Nail files, electric; Nail nippers; Nail scissors; Nail skin treatment trimmers; Needle files; Sanding blocksACTIVEJul 3, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance