USPTO serial 97124506
OPTIMAL TRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 809Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, TARYN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with OPTIMAL TRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwenn Roos
Gwenn Roos ONSIDECOUNSEL/LAW OFFICE OF GWENN ROOS26 BROOKDALE AVENUEWELLESLEY, MA 02482United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of training courses in the field of leadership and executive management; Business education and training services, namely, developing customized in-company leadership and executive development programs, providing executive coaching services, and providing public and in-company keynote presentations to business leaders; Business education and training services, namely, developing customized leadership and executive development programs, providing executive coaching services, and providing business education programs to employees and executives; Business training; Business training consultancy services; Business training in the field of business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, lectures, teleseminars, teleclasses, and workshops in personal awareness; Educational services, namely, providing on-line seminars, non-downloadable webinars, podcasts, lectures, informational sessions in the field of business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Educational services, namely, providing educational speakers in the field of business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers in the field of self- and personal improvement; Leadership development training for educators; Professional coaching services in the field of in the field of business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Providing a web site that features informal instruction on leadership development, business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable articles in the field of leadership development, business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Workshops and seminars in the field of leadership development, business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Arranging and conducting of business congresses in the field of leadership development; Arranging and conducting of professional workshops in the field of leadership development, business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Arranging and conducting of training workshops in the field of leadership development, business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Conducting workshops and seminars in leadership development, business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Leadership development training in the field of business productivity and effectiveness, relationship building; Providing group coaching and in-person learning forums in the field of leadership development | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2026 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2024 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 15, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 4, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |