USPTO serial 97124623
SEREBROFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYS, CANDACE W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEREBROFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BELGOROD REGION, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven War
STEVEN WAR WAR IP LAW PLLC5335 WISCONSIN AVE., N.W.SUITE 440WASHINGTON, DC 20015Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic aperitifs; Aerated water; Lithia water; Mineral water; Seltzer water; Soda water; Table waters; Non-alcoholic cocktails; Lemonades; Peanut milk as a soft drink; Isotonic beverages; Whey beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Milk of almonds for beverage; Non-alcoholic fruit nectars; Beer; Ginger ale; Ginger beer; Malt beer; Powders for effervescing beverages, namely, soft drinks; Sarsaparilla ; Syrups for lemonade; Syrups for beverages; Tomato juice; Non-alcoholic fruit cider; Vegetable juices; Fruit juices; Preparations for making aerated water; Preparations for making liqueurs, namely, essences used in the preparation of liqueurs; Preparations for making mineral water; Preparations for making beverages, namely, soft drinks; Must; Unfermented grape must; Beer wort; Malt wort; Pastilles for effervescing beverages, namely, soft drinks; Sherbets; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Extracts of hops for making beer; Essences for making non-alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Aperitifs; Arak; Brandy; Wine; Piquette in the nature of wines; Whiskey; Anisette; Kirsch; Vodka; Gin; Digesters in the nature of liqueurs and spirits; Cocktails, namely, prepared alcoholic cocktail; Anise; Curacao; Liqueurs; Alcoholic beverages, except beer; Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Spirits; Distilled beverages, namely, distilled spirits; Hydromel; Peppermint liqueurs; Alcoholic bitters; Rum; Sake; Hard cider; Perry; Distilled spirits of rice; Alcoholic extracts; Alcoholic fruit extracts; Alcoholic essences | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |