USPTO serial 97125748
DSL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DSL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Tener, Esq.
David M. Tener, Esq. CAESAR RIVISE, PC1635 MARKET STREET7 PENN CENTER, 12TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital signage display panels; Downloadable computer software for design, development, and updating of digital electronic labels; Electronic tags for goods; Labels carrying electronically recorded or encoded information; Labels carrying magnetically, optically, or electronically recorded or encoded information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for design, development, and updating of digital electronic labels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |