Drawing for METAMEDIA

USPTO serial 97126881

METAMEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBIN, DAVID I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METAMEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole B. Rackiewicz

NICOLE B. RACKIEWICZ ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Network Routers; Network Cards; Gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; Computer hardware, namely, computer network bridges; Computer hardware, namely, communications servers; Videophones; Voice over internet protocol telephone in the nature of VOIP phones; Digital video and audio players, namely, digital audio and video recorders and players; Video Transformers, namely, electrical transformers; Network radios being radios; Set-top boxes; Network signal repeater in the nature of computer hardware, namely, wireless network repeaters; Network signal adapter, namely, computer hardware; Wireless base station, namely, computer hardware; Portable media players; audio speakers; computer monitorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance