USPTO serial 97127549
AS ABOVE SO BELOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AS ABOVE SO BELOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Tobin
JONATHAN TOBIN COUNSEL FOR CREATORS LLP680 E COLORADO BLVD, STE 180PASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Agate and sardonyx; Amulets; Ankle bracelets; Bangle bracelets; Bangles; Beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry; Body jewelry; Bolo ties with precious metal tips; Bracelets; Bracelets; Bracelets of precious metal; Chalcedony; Charms; Children's jewelry; Chokers; Clasps for jewellery; Clasps for jewelry; Cuff links; Cuff links of precious metal; Cuff-links; Cufflinks; Cut diamonds; Diamond jewelry; Diamonds; Ear clips; Ear studs; Earrings; Gems; Gemstone jewelry; Gemstones; Gold; Gold and its alloys; Jewel chains; Jewel pendants; Jewellery; Jewellery and precious stones; Jewellery cases; Jewellery chain of precious metal for bracelets; Jewellery chains; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry boxes not of metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry findings; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, stone pendants; Jewels; Necklaces; Pet jewelry; Precious and semi-precious crystal stones and beads for use in jewelry; Precious and semi-precious gems; Precious and semi-precious minerals; Precious and semi-precious stones; Precious gemstones; Precious jewels; Precious metal alloys; Precious metals; Precious metals and alloys thereof; Precious metals and their alloys; Precious stones; Processed or semi-processed precious metals; Rings; Rings being jewelry; Sapphire; Semi-precious and precious stones; Semi-precious gemstones; Semi-precious stones; Silver; Wedding rings; Women's jewelry; Wooden jewellery boxes | ACTIVE | Nov 29, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |