USPTO serial 97129273
ZEUS CLOUD BUILDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GERMICK JR., EDWARD JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZEUS CLOUD BUILDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUSTIN JOHANSON
JUSTIN JOHANSON JOHANSON PARKER21920 E. PEGASUS PARKWAYQUEEN CREEK, AZ 85142UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to build a secure cloud computing environment; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to build and deploy an infrastructure and virtual systems; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to build and deploy a secure cloud computing environment; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to select a cloud computing system for executin; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to using computing resources in a cloud resources; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for building a secure cloud computing environment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for deployment of infrastructure and cloud computing systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for deployment of infrastructure and virtual systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for using computing resources in a cloud resources; Software development consulting in the field of deployment of infrastructure and cloud computing systems; Software development consulting in the field of deployment of infrastructure and virtual systems; Software development consulting in the field of building a secure cloud computing environment; Software development consulting in the field of controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud resources; Software development consulting in the field of using computing resources in a cloud resources; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for build and deploy an infrastructure and cloud computing systems; Computer software design; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Developing customized software in the field of building a secure cloud computing environment for others; Developing customized software in the field of building a secure infrastructure and virtual systems for others; Developing customized software in the field of selecting a cloud computing environment for others; Developing customized software in the field of using computing resources in a cloud resources for others; Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to build and deploy an infrastructure and virtual systems; Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to building a secure cloud computing environment; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for building a secure cloud computing environment; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for using computing resources in a cloud resources; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |