USPTO serial 97134562
MPROOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCNAMARA, SHANA MARIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MPROOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christen Bartelt
Christen Bartelt LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTEN BARTELT21354 RAMBLA VISTAMALIBU, CA 90265United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing online non-downloadable articles in the field of education techniques and methodology for use by instructors to create learning experiences | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring non-downloadable software providing a platform to allow a user to create a learning experience on any topic that incorporates a system of skill and attribute assessment, learning prioritization, task assignment, prioritization and completion tracking, including gamified competition, avatars and leaderboards, and facilitates accountability and encouragement through the in-app interaction between school students, coaches, family, friends, peers and others; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring non-downloadable software providing a platform to allow a user to access a learning experience on any topic that incorporates a system of skill and attribute assessment, learning prioritization, task assignment, prioritization and completion tracking, including gamified competition, avatars and leaderboards, and facilitates accountability and encouragement through the in-app interaction between school students, coaches, family, friends, peers and others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |