USPTO serial 97137353
THE GOOD FLOUR CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE GOOD FLOUR CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Geller
Michael A. Geller DLA PIPER LLP (US)444 West Lake Street, Suite 900DLA Piper LLP (US)Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | buns; cake batter; flour; pizza dough; pizza crusts; pancake and waffle mixes; food coatings, namely, batter mixes for fish, meat and vegetables; mixes for making batter for fried foods; bakery goods, namely, bread, cakes, muffins, brownies, cookies, donuts, pancakes, biscuits, scones, pizzas, and tortillas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2022 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2022 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2022 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |