USPTO serial 97139065
HORNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHEATLEY, TRAVIS DWIGHT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HORNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTVALE, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, COMPUTERS; COMPUTER MICE; VIDEO CONFERENCE EQUIPMENT, namely, VIDEO MONITORS, MICROPHONES, AUDIO SPEAKERS, AND CAMERAS; REMOTE CONTROLS FOR RADIOS, TELEVISIONS, STEREOS, LIGHTS, VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS, DVD MACHINES, AND ELECTRONIC DOOR OPENERS; COMPONENTS TOGETHER WITH ACCESSORIES AND PARTS IN THE CONSUMER ELECTRONICS AREA, namely, TELEVISIONS, RADIOS, STEREOS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS, DVD MACHINES AND REMOTE CONTROLS FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED ITEMS; ANTI-INTRUSION SECURITY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SECURITY ALARMS, ANTI-INTRUSION ALARMS, INTRUSION DETECTORS, PERSONAL SECURITY ALARMS, AND ELECTRONIC MOTION SENSITIVE SWITCHES; ELECTRICAL AND HEATING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF CONTROLLERS, THERMOSTATS, AND ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING WIRES; GLASS BREAKAGE MONITORING SENSORS; WIRELESS KEYPADS; CHILD MONITORING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF VIDEO CAMERAS, AND AUDIO SPEAKERS; SMOKE AND FIRE DETECTORS; FIRE ALARMS; ALARM STATIONS COMPRISED OF FIRE ALARMS AND REMOTE CONTROLS FOR FIRE ALARMS; PERSONAL TRANSPONDERS;VOICE CONTROL SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF VOICE SENSORS AND VOICE RECOGNITION SOFTWARE; INTEROPERABLE ELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER DEVICES ENABLED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION; ELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER DEVICES ENABLED VIA INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION; DEVICES FOR ENABLING ELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER DEVICES FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, namely, SINGLE-CHANNEL RADIO COMMUNICATION MACHINES AND APPARATUS FOR FIXED STATIONS, RADIO TRANSMITTERS, RADIO RECEIVERS, WIRELESS ACCESS POINT (WAP) DEVICES, ANTENNAS, GATEWAY ROUTERS IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTER CONTROL HARDWARE, AND MODEMS; Downloadable operating system programs; Recorded operating system programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2022 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |