USPTO serial 97139863
COBY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COBY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEE J. EULGEN
LEE J. EULGEN NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO NORTH LASALLE STREETSUITE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food blenders for household purposes; electric coffee grinder; electric coffee maker; electric can openers; electric food choppers; electric food slicers; electric knives; electric food processors; electric juicers; electric meat grinders; electric milk frothers; electric kitchen mixers; electric pasta makers for household purposes; kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers; electric vacuum food sealers for household purposes; electric juicer and blender combination; electric hot pot; electric food blenders for household purposes, namely, electric stick blenders | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic weighing scales for kitchen use | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Bread baking machines; single and double burners being gas burners for domestic use; countertop convection oven; electric toaster ovens; electric cupcake makers; electric doughnut makers; electric griddles; electric roasters; electric broilers; electric tea kettles; electric woks; electric food dehydrators; electric food steamers; electric ice cream makers; electromagnetic induction cookers; mini ice makers being ice cube making machines; electric panini makers; domestic cooking ovens; electric popcorn poppers; electric pressure cookers; electric rice cookers; electric sandwich makers; electric slow cookers; electric sous-vide cookers; electric toasters; electric waffle makers; electric yogurt makers; pizza ovens; rotisserie ovens being electric rotisseries; toaster cooker combination being a multipurpose, electric countertop food preparation apparatus; contact grill being electric grills; espresso coffee makers being electric espresso machines; electric coffee makers; electric appliances, namely, ice tea makers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Electric bottle openers; non-electric drip coffee maker; buffet serving utensils being serving scoops, serving tongs, serving forks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |