USPTO serial 97140264
CONNECT. PROTECT. DEFEND.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PURATH, ANICKA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONNECT. PROTECT. DEFEND.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marina Del Rey, CA, US
Marina Del Rey, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britt L. Anderson
Britt L. Anderson PERKINS COIE LLP3150 Porter Dr.Palo Alto, CA 94304United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing electronic message alerts via telecommunications networks; telecommunications services, namely, providing electronic network connections to telecommunications operators; telecommunications services, namely, providing access to computer networks used for voice communications, SMS communications, and audio streaming; communication services, namely, transmission of data from cloud networks for telecommunications networks via the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services and electronic transmission and delivery of email, text, and video messages; Telecommunication services provided via platforms and portals on the internet, namely, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services and electronic transmission and delivery of email, text and video messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in identifying and verifying the identity of participants in transactions conducted over local, wide area, and global computer and data storage networks; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring application programming interface (API) software for use in a cloud-based telecommunication platform, for user identity authentication, personal identity information access and management, user identification, authentication, and verification with integrated multi-factor authentication, and for facilitating multi-factor authentication; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for user identity authentication, personal identity information access and management, user identification, authentication, and verification with integrated multi-factor authentication, and for facilitating multi-factor authentication; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for authentication of user identities, digital identification of authorized users, anti-fraud protection, communication sharing, digital advertising and identity management; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software and on-line, non-downloadable software development tools for use in enabling, tracking, analyzing, and managing cloud communication services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TeleSign Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by TeleSign Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONNECT. PROTECT. DEFEND.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |