Drawing for CONTROL4 HALO

USPTO serial 97140512

CONTROL4 HALO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTROL4 HALO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen R. Baird

Stephen R. Baird Greenberg Traurig, LLP90 South Seventh Street, Suite 3500Minneapolis, MN 55402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic integrated control systems for remotely monitoring and controlling the function and status of electrical, electronic and mechanical devices or systems, namely appliances, climate control systems, intercom systems, telecommunication systems, and entertainment systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 20, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 30, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 30, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 1, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 31, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 17, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 12, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 3, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance