USPTO serial 97146099
NUTSBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATZINGER, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTSBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J Beardall
David J Beardall Beardall Patent Associates416 W 40 SProvidence, UT 84332United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Balls for sports; Battery operated action toys; Body-building apparatus; Construction toys incorporating magnets; Dolls and playsets therefor; Electric action toys; Game equipment set sold as a unit comprised primarily of a playing board and playing cards and also including rules of play, dry erase boards and erasers, markers, a timer and T-shirts; Kits for building outdoor play equipment; Mechanical toys; Parlor games; Toy building blocks; Toy for pets; Toy imitation cosmetics; Toy models; Water toys | ACTIVE | Oct 14, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 31, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |