USPTO serial 97149980
META BROKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATEL, SHEENA KAPOOR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with META BROKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parrish S. Nordan
Parrish S. Nordan NORDAN LICENSING2626 COLE AVE SUITE 300DALLAS, TX 75204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of downloadable digital art images authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); Provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of downloadable digital assets stored on a blockchain wherein said services provide a "meta" business concept and system for creating, trading, and managing NFTs on a platform that brings together sports, music, and entertainment to create unique digital experiences as well as the opportunity for fans to have ownership in clients' future success, and the aforementioned digital assets are authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) | ACTIVE | Dec 9, 2021 |
| 036 | Broker-dealer financial services in the field of digital assets stored on a blockchain authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) wherein said services provide a "meta" business concept and system for creating, trading, and managing NFTs on a platform that brings together sports, music, and entertainment to create unique digital experiences as well as the opportunity for fans to have ownership in clients' future success | ACTIVE | Dec 9, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |