USPTO serial 97153337
SUCCESSPRACTICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROCCA, ALAINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUCCESSPRACTICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caitlin R. Byczko
Caitlin R. Byczko BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for allowing users to access, compare and analyze data in the field of diversity, inclusion, workplace culture, and employee morale; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for monitoring enterprise workplace culture; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software in the field of human resources for retrieving, tracking, analyzing, displaying, visualizing, optimizing, testing, measuring and managing employee and workplace data; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for promoting employee retention; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for using metrics and data to measure the strengths and weaknesses of an organization's culture; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software in the field of employment management; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for retrieving, tracking, analyzing, displaying, visualizing, optimizing, testing, measuring and managing employee data; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for skills-based learning, employee engagement, and talent management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for retrieving, tracking, analyzing, displaying, visualizing, optimizing, testing, measuring, generating and managing employee insights; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for retrieving, tracking, analyzing, displaying, visualizing, optimizing, testing, measuring, generating and managing employee benchmarking, namely, employee performance; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for promoting employment success and best practices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |