USPTO serial 97155755
DIRECT SCAN TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRECT SCAN TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodcliff Lake, NJ, US
Pearl River, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis J. Duffin
Francis J. Duffin Wiggin and Dana LLPOne Century Tower, 265 Church StreetNew Haven, CT 06510United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Containers of metal for chemicals, compressed gases and liquids; Containers of metal for compressed gas or liquid air; Containers of metal for liquid gas; Containers of metal for storage or transport; Metal containers for compressed gas or liquid air; Metal containers for storage or transport; Metal storage containers for refrigerant gas | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Data processing services in the field of tracking refrigerant supply chain; Logistics management in the field of refrigerant tracking, supply, and disposition; Tracking and monitoring refrigerant and refrigerant vessels for others for account auditing purposes; Tracking and monitoring refrigerant and refrigerant vessels for others for cost accounting purposes; Analyzing and compiling business data; Analyzing and compiling business data for ensuring compliance with laws, rules and regulations relating to refrigerant logistics and disposition; Business data analysis services in the field of refrigerant tracking; Business management of logistics for others; Business management of logistics for others by means of encoded refrigerant container tracking, tracing, and accounting; Information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management; Monitoring refrigerant containers, and refrigerant therein for business purposes; Office functions in the nature of tracking and tracing of refrigerant, reclaimed refrigerant, refrigerant disposition in transit; Providing electronic tracking of freight information to others for business administration purposes; Services consisting of the registration, collection, transcription, compilation and systemization of written communications and data; Updating and maintenance of data in computer databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Recycling; Recycling of chemicals; Recycling of refrigerant; Refrigerant reclamation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hudson Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hudson Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named DIRECT SCAN TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |