USPTO serial 97156251
RINGFENCING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JARAMILLO, JAVIER R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RINGFENCING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERRY J. VISCOUNTY
PERRY J. VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable anti-piracy software; Downloadable anti-spyware software; Downloadable cloud-based software for controlling application access to data; Downloadable communication software for providing access to the Internet; Downloadable communications software for connecting applications to data; Downloadable computer software and firmware for controlling application access to data; Downloadable computer software designed to be deployed on web servers for controlling application access to data; Downloadable computer software development tools; Downloadable computer software for administration of computer local area networks; Downloadable computer software for administration of computer networks; Downloadable computer software for application and database integration; Downloadable computer software for authorising access to data bases; Downloadable computer software for authorising access to databases; Downloadable computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; Downloadable computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; Downloadable computer software for database management; Downloadable computer software for document management; Downloadable computer software for use in computer access control; Downloadable computer software for use in database management; Downloadable computer anti-virus software; Downloadable interactive software for controlling application access to data; Downloadable middleware for software application integration; Downloadable middleware for controlling application access to data; Downloadable network access server operating software; Computer hardware, namely, firewalls; Downloadable computer software for the creation of firewalls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |