USPTO serial 97162081
BRAND OPTIMAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAND OPTIMAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
Otto O. Lee INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP1871 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 250SAN JOSE, CA 95126United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; Media relations services; Consultancy regarding advertising communication strategies; Business management consultancy; Media buying advice, namely, advising the client how much media time, and at what times the client should be purchasing advertising; Targeted marketing services | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2021 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for advertising, media, communication and business management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for media buying, namely, identifying and purchasing advertisement space on channels that are relevant to the target audience; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for emotional targeting, namely, advertising using emotional triggers in order to reach a target audience's feelings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |