USPTO serial 97162932
ASTROTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASTROTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lakewood Ranch, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik M. Pelton
PO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services in the nature of providing telephone services with various telephone features, namely, fax capabilities, email hosting and filtering, controlling and maintaining toll free numbers; providing Administrative Operating Company Number (AOCN) Services to Competitive Local Exchange Carriers(CLEC), namely, providing telephone services; CLEC services, namely, ordering long distance services on behalf of CLECs and providing CLEC number testing, namely, providing telephone services; hosting telecommunication operations support systems, namely, telecommunications access services; personal numbering services telephony services, namely, local number portability services, namely, providing telephone services; consulting services, namely, consulting CLECs in interconnection, growth, day-to-day operations, required back-office systems, billing systems, resource management, regulatory processes reports, and number portability, namely, telecommunications consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |