Drawing for SANDSHARK

USPTO serial 97164588

SANDSHARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SANDSHARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Geoffrey D. Aurini

Geoffrey D. Aurini HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DRIVESUITE 200TROY, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Collet-activated downhole sliding sleeves and actuating collet members for such sliding sleeves, for use in fracturing operations carried out during well completions and fracking of wellsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2023GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2023GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2023CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance