Drawing for WIN SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 97165630

WIN SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, TARYN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIN SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard H Newman

Richard H Newman NEWMAN LAW, LLC7435 S EASTERN AVE, SUITE 105-431LAS VEGAS, NV 89123United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Electronic gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wager; Electronic and electro-mechanical casino gaming tables with video output; Gaming equipment, namely, game wheels; Gaming machines; Gaming machines featuring embedded software for accepting wagers; Gaming machines featuring preinstalled software for accepting wagers; Gaming machines that generate or display wager outcomes; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely, electronic slot and bingo machines; Gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wager; Roulette wheels; Slot machines; Gaming devices, namely, gaming machines, slot machines, bingo machines, with or without video output; Preinstalled software for accepting wagers sold as a component of gaming machinesACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of casino operational and gaming systems, namely, electronic gaming machines, slot machines, electronic and electro-mechanical gaming platforms, multiplayer gaming platforms, cashless payment processing devices, casino management devices, player tracking devices, and related computer hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 26, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 15, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 13, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 29, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 4, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 9, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 2, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 4, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance