USPTO serial 97166629
PICNIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PICNIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Espenshade
Steven M. Espenshade PIRKEY BARBER PLLC1801 EAST 6TH STREET, SUITE 300AUSTIN, TX 78702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Digital advertising services; Banner advertising; arrangement of advertising; advertising via the Internet; analysis of advertising response; intermediary services relating to advertising; advertising services provided via the Internet; compilation, production and dissemination of advertising matter; online advertising network matching services for connecting advertisers to websites | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software platforms for the creation and hosting of advertising campaigns; platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software platforms for advertising formats; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring software platforms for the transmission of images, audio-visual content, video content and messages; hosting of communication platforms on the Internet; hosting of digital content; designing websites for advertising purposes; programming of software for others for online advertising; hosting electronic memory space on the Internet in the nature of websites of others for advertising goods and services; development of application software for delivery of multimedia content; all of the aforesaid related to advertising; none of the aforesaid being in relation to social media websites or applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |