USPTO serial 97169804
FARM HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FARM HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard S. Hogan
Howard S. Hogan GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W.,WASHINGTON, DC, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Salads, namely, garden salads and vegetable salads; Packaged lettuce; Packaged cut vegetables; Pre-cut vegetable salads; Fruit and vegetable salads; Packaged salad kits consisting primarily of vegetables; Salad mixes comprised primarily of pre-cut fresh lettuce and pre-cut fresh vegetables and salad dressings sold as a unit; Salad kits comprised primarily of pre-cut lettuce, pre-cut vegetables, pre-cut fruit, salad toppings consisting of processed nuts, processed seeds, dried fruit, cheese, croutons, crispy rice noodles, tortilla strips, pita chips, and salad dressing all sold together as a unit; Salad kits comprised of pre-cut lettuce, pre-cut vegetables, pre-cut fruit, chicken, turkey, meat, eggs, and processed beans, salad toppings consisting of processed nuts, processed seeds, dried fruit, cheese, processed beans, processed olives, smoked bacon, roasted corn, couscous, croutons, crispy rice noodles, wonton strips, tortilla strips, pita chips, and salad dressing all sold together as a unit; Vegetables, namely, fresh cut, washed, and packaged baby romaine lettuce, green leaf lettuce, red leaf lettuce, arugula, butter lettuce, iceberg lettuce, spring lettuce mix, baby spinach, vegetable based herb salad mix, baby kale, escarole, radicchio | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2023 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |