USPTO serial 97172362
Z7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKSHOOD, AKEELA MOHAMED
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Z7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN J. NATAUPSKY
STEVEN J. NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical catheters for use in the neurovascular system; Access catheters for the introduction of medical devices in the neurovascular system; Aspiration catheters for use in the neurovascular system; Medical pumps for use in the neurovascular system, namely, vacuum pumps and aspiration pumps; Medical filters for use in the neurovascular system, namely filters for capturing debris and clots in the bloodstream; All of the foregoing for use by medical healthcare professionals in the neurovascular field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |