USPTO serial 97172505
CE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn E. Rzonca
Lynn E. Rzonca Ballard Spahr LLP1735 Market Street, 51st FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric bag sealers; electric food blenders; electric juicers; electric food mixers; electric mixers for household purposes; electrical squeezers for fruit and vegetable; electrically-powered kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food; hand-held electric-powered food processors; kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers; kitchen products, namely, juice machines; electric vacuum food sealers for household purposes; household utensils in the nature of electric whisks for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Chef knives; table cutlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Barbecue grills; bread-making machines; convection ovens; deep fryer, electric; deep frying machines; electric bread cookers; electric cookware, namely, roasters; electric fryers; electric frying pans; electric griddles; electric grills; electric indoor grills; electric kettles; electric pressure cookers; electric rice cooker; electric roasters; electric rotisseries; electric skillets; electric slow cookers; electric toaster ovens; electric toasters; electric waffle irons; electrical ice cream makers; microwave ovens; electric coffee makers; ice making machine; air fryers; bbq accessories, namely, barbecue smokers, barbecue smoker cooking grates, lava rock for use in barbecue grills; cookware, namely electric food steamers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | bbq accessories, namely, barbecue forks, barbecue mitts, barbecue tongs; Bakeware, namely, cookie sheets, baking sheets, cake pans, muffin and pie pans, loaf pans, roast pans, pizza pans and expandable cake pans; cookware, namely, pots, pans, roasting pans, non-electric cooking steamers; household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs, spatulas, cooking and mixing spoons, non-electric whisks, ladles; baking mats; cooking strainers; cutting boards; mixing bowls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |