USPTO serial 97172903
DATABASE OF EVIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATABASE OF EVIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. McGinnis
BRIAN J. MCGINNIS BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | brand strategy services, namely, providing customized communication programs to obtain consumer insights and develop branding strategies, design, development and delivery of business to business and direct to consumer advertising campaigns across digital platforms; Business consultancy services in the field of online content, social risk and crisis detection and moderation using predictive and extended intelligence (EI); business consultancy in the field of anti-piracy and anti-counterfeiting; Online monitoring and moderation services and business advisory related to cyber threats, namely, monitoring, detecting, tracking, moderating and managing user behavior, harassment, and offensive and negative user-generated content on websites, social networks, discussion forums, online gaming and other online communities for business purposes, all provided through a computer software technology platform using artificial intelligence; media monitoring services using computer software to automatically monitor internet websites, print and electronic publications, social media, blogs, internet radio and other online and offline media for customer-specified topics and to capture relevant content on those topics, and providing documentation and analysis of that online content to others for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | monitoring of computer systems for fraud detection; monitoring of computer systems for anti-money laundering protection; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for locating and identifying brand and consumer risks online and for notifying, logging and reporting risks to brands, consumers and vulnerable internet users; computer services, namely, providing image and text filtering services to protect websites and online applications from objectionable content; providing image moderation and profanity filtering services; DAAS (Data as a Service) for providing feeds of harmful content, suspicious behavior indicators or other relevant data to technology platforms and brands for the purposes of keeping their platforms safe | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |