USPTO serial 97174658
SNAPSHOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RATCLIFFE,ROBERT L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNAPSHOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, AB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter Haug Partners. LLP745 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10151United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Disinfectants; Alcohol for medicinal purposes; Alcohol for pharmaceutical purposes; Alcohol for topical use; Antibacterial alcohol skin sanitizer gel; Hand-sanitizing preparations; Isopropyl alcohol for medical use; Medicinal alcohol; Rubbing alcohol | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |