USPTO serial 97174730
RIDE THE WIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, JOSEPH PATRICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIDE THE WIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian B. Darville
Brian B. Darville OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services for wind energy generation, namely, business venture development and formation consulting services for the renewable energy industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Consultancy relating to the installation of wind turbines, namely, wind turbine site selection; maintenance of wind turbines; all of the foregoing for wind energy generation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological research in the field of renewable energy resources; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of renewable energy resources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McDonough Innovation, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by McDonough Innovation, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RIDE THE WIND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |