USPTO serial 97185584
CAPTAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPTAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOUISVILLE, KY, US
Louisville, KY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britt L. Anderson
Britt L. Anderson PERKINS COIE LLP3150 Porter Dr.Palo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business administration of construction contract receivables; procurement services, namely, management of purchasing for construction contractors; recruiting services; providing lead generation services in the construction industry; business information services, namely, providing information on model contracts in the construction industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Factoring of construction contract receivables; construction contract payment services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in business support, administration, and management of receivables for construction contractors; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for purchasing (factoring) construction contract receivables; Providing on-line non-downloadable software used for administration and management support for construction contractors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |