USPTO serial 97187029
EYEFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYEFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin J. Lehberger
BENJAMIN J. LEHBERGER DILWORTH IP, LLC470 JAMES STREET, SUITE 007NEW HAVEN, CT 06513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user defined information, personal profiles, and information; providing on-line nondownloadable software; providing on-line computer mapping services; mapping services, namely, providing a website and website links to geographic information, map images, and trip routing and trip tracking; online geographical determination from visual images; geosearching capability services; online geographical targeting through image processing; provision of geographical information; design and development services for others of software for managing, collecting, monitoring and analyzing web, blog and other online site traffic, user preferences and links; technical support and consulting services related to all of the foregoing; computer consultation services related to all of the foregoing; intelligence gathering services through image monitoring; intelligence gathering services using fixed, mobile, airborne and wearable technologies; online monitoring of assets including natural and civil engineering assets including dams, drains, roads, public spaces, waste management; Monitoring of computer systems by remote access; monitoring and intelligence gathering from sensors, cameras, monitors. On-line remote monitoring; online services amalgamating multiple on-line monitoring sources; managing online network of sensors, monitors, imaging technology; On-line software services related to incident management; Design and development of computer software for incident management; Design and development of computer software for bushfire management and response; Environmental monitoring services. Design and development of computer software; development and provision of software-as-a-service (SAAS) online including for any of the predefined services; Design and provision of Platform as a Service (PaaS) including for any of the predefined services; Online provision of web-based software (non-downloadable) including for any of the predefined services; Provision of online non-downloadable software (application service provider) including for any of the predefined services; Design and development of computer software for internet-of-things including for any of the predefined services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |