Drawing for HYPHA EXPEDITION

USPTO serial 97187534

HYPHA EXPEDITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPHA EXPEDITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia W. Stangle

Claudia W. Stangle LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Proteins for the food industry; Proteins for use in the manufacture of foods, beverages, and supplementsACTIVE—
005Herbal supplements for health containing fungi and mushroom mycelia; Protein dietary supplements; Protein dietary supplements formed and packaged as bars; Protein supplements; Protein supplements formed and packaged as bars; Liquid protein supplements; Nutritional supplement in the nature of a nutrient-dense, protein-based drink mix; Vegan protein for use as a nutritional supplement in ready-to-drink beverages; Vegan liquid protein supplementsACTIVE—
029Meat substitutes; Non-dairy milk substitutes; Textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender; Vegetable-based meat substitutesACTIVE—
030Flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; Flavorings for beverages, other than essential oils; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for cheeses; Food flavourings, other than essential oils; High-protein cereal bars; Natural sweetenersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 13, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance