USPTO serial 97187748
TRUE REVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUE REVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Port Jefferson, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Fisher
1031 MAIN STREETPORT JEFFERSON, NY 11777UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | A social media application and website for use to instantly search and display whether or not the public is truly satisfied with a product or service or a business through a final, easily-understandable ranking, and this final ranking is backed by multiple, honest reviews of the product, service or business; the reviews are generated by individuals who receive a reward only for honesty and not for whether the review is positive or whether the user ultimately purchases the product or service, or patronizes the business; powered by the principles of block-chain technology, an anti-abuse system amalgamates all customer reviews into a final ranking while still providing the raw reviews, which can be accessed by the user by virtue of a peer video verification system; the peer review verification system uses social media and other analytics to provide reviews to the user from "peers", people the user are likely to know based upon social media, people who are in close geographical proximity and people with similar interests, tastes or pursuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |