USPTO serial 97193136
BETTER SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOSCATI, JUSTIN RONALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTER SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L Rasmussen
Christopher L Rasmussen INVENTUS LAW, PC.355 BRYANT STREETSUITE 403SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wearable, programmable, and portable security device in the nature of personal security alarms detecting human motion, position changes, vibrations, and temperature changes; personal security alarms that connect to a wireless communications network; personal security protection devices in the nature of personal security alarms, using flashing light emitting diodes and sound | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of electronic media, data, messages, graphics, images, photos, videos, audio-visual content and files; Providing network access to computer, electronics, and online databases, namely, providing user access to computer programs in data networks, providing access to telecommunication networks, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; Wireless computer communication services over networks, namely, wireless broadband communication services, wireless electronic transmission of data and graphics via near field communication (NFC) technology-enabled devices; Bridge to lowpower wide-area network services from other networks, namely, wireless electronic transmission of data and graphics, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network via wireless electronic transmission, short-range wireless, near-field communication (NFC), and long-term evolution (LTE) technology enabled devices. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for personal security for detecting human motion, position changes, vibrations, and temperature changes for personal protection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mimiq, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mimiq, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BETTER SAFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |