Drawing for Serial No. 97195801

USPTO serial 97195801

Serial No. 97195801

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNER, CHRISTIAN LOUISE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 97195801?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irene Y. Lee

Irene Y. Lee RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD, 12TH FL.LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audiovisual recordings via the internet; broadcasting audio and video content via a computer network; live audio and video teleconferencing services; video teleconferencing services; web conferencing services; providing internet chat roomsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 21, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 20, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2022LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Mar 10, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2022MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance