USPTO serial 97205023
PRECISION ECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRECISION ECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, MB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lekha Gopalakrishnan
Lekha Gopalakrishnan WINSTEAD PC2728 North Harwood Street, Suite 500Dallas, TX 75201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Anaesthetic masks; masks for use by medical personnel; masks for use by veterinary medical personnel; facial masks for use by dental care providers; face masks for use by health care providers; sanitary masks for medical purposes; sanitary masks for medical wellness purposes; sanitary masks for virus isolation purposes; surgical masks; therapeutic facial masks; single-use sanitary masks for medical use, namely, protective face masks for medical use; Air purifying sanitary facial masks, namely, protective face masks for medical use that filter at least 95% of airborne particles; respirator facial masks, namely, respiratory masks for medical purposes for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection that filter at least 95% of airborne particles; facial masks with replaceable filtration media for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection; Protective face masks with separate spunbond, meltblown fabrics for personal protection use sold as a unit, for medical use; Filters for use in medical equipment, namely, air filters for medical ventilators, air filters for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection, and air filters for use in sanitary masks for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Biodegradable filters for water purification, namely, for personal protection from viral infection and bacterial infection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |