USPTO serial 97205303
Serial No. 97205303
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAUSS, JERAMEY WALLACE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 97205303?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica N. Clemente
Jessica N. Clemente HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLACEROCHESTER, NY 14604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Consulting services in the field of computer software training | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software consultancy; IT consulting services; Consultancy in the field of software development; Consultancy in the field of software customization; Technical support services, namely, computer software consultancy in the field of software optimization; managed application services consultancy, namely, consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the field of information technology relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software as it relates to Learning Management Systems (LMS) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |