USPTO serial 97207982
AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING FOR THE REAL WORLD.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUENAS, TAYLOR S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOMATED DECISION-MAKING FOR THE REAL WORLD.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Louis, MO
Saint Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline Chicoine
Caroline Chicoine HUSCH BLACKWELL190 CARONDELET PLAZASTE 600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring proprietary computer software for acquiring, organizing, transferring, storing, and analyzing data; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring proprietary computer software for building, training, testing, and deploying of machine learning models; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring proprietary computer software for the rapidly developing machine learning models through a fully composable environment; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring proprietary computer software for the developing machine learning models by non-technical users through a fully composable environment; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring proprietary computer software for developing machine learning models to compete against one another; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring propriety computer software for evaluating the efficiency and efficacy of machine learning models; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring proprietary computer software for developing crowd-sourcing machine learning models; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software for pricing digital advertising impressions in real- time; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software for selecting advertisements for placement across digital properties in real time; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software for managing data from digital advertising services; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software for digital advertising services, namely, computer software for advertising management, analytics and reporting of advertising data; technological consultancy services in the field of search engine optimization; creation of advertisements, namely, providing a website that gives multiple computer users simultaneously the ability to create advertisements; Platform as a services (PAAS) featuring computer software for customizing, tailoring, targeting, and filtering advertisement placement and content; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software for advertising audience targeting and tracking; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software for pricing and determining costs related to digital advertising services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |